Contract review & management · $100/month
The least painful fastest way from
redline to signature.
Word-native redlining in the browser. AI review that cites its sources. A permanent record of every version and every decision — for teams that negotiate real contracts without a legal department.
Exhibit A — before
MSA_final.docx
MSA_final_v2.docx
MSA_final_v2_REAL.docx
MSA_FINAL_use this one.docx
did legal ever see v5?? — asking for the auditors
( nobody knows which one is real )
Exhibit B — after
MSA — Meridian Robotics one record
- v1 received by email Mon 09:12
- v2 your redline · 6 tracked changes Mon 16:40
- v3 their revision · auto-filed Wed 11:03
- v4 approved — off to signature Thu 10:21
every version preserved · every decision attributed
§ 1 — Recitals (the part where we acknowledge reality)
Whereas, somewhere right now a six-figure deal is being negotiated through a file named…
MSA_v7_edits_JK_final_FINAL_clean(2)_USE-THIS-ONE.docx
a.Reply-all archaeology
The current draft is an attachment on an email from eleven days ago, quoted four replies deep. Probably. Nobody wants to say they're not sure.
b.The invisible edit
Their lawyer turned off tracked changes for one little paragraph. You'll find it in eight months, right after it costs you money.
c.The $40k spreadsheet
Enterprise contract software fixed all this years ago — for companies that can spend a salary on it. Everyone else got a shared drive and a prayer.
Now, therefore: professional contract management shouldn't require a procurement committee to purchase — and "affordable" shouldn't mean a folder named Contracts — FINAL.
§ 2 — The work itself
Redline in the browser. It's still a real Word file.
Type, strike, comment, renumber — every edit lands in the .docx as a genuine tracked change with your name on it. Your counterparty never knows you left Word.
7.Term and Termination
7.1 This Agreement commences on the Effective Date and continues for an initial term of twelve (12) twenty-four (24) months, renewing automatically unless either party gives thirty (30) sixty (60) Inserted · Dana Ferro [Meridian Robotics] Accept Reject ✨ Explain implications days' written notice of non-renewal.
7.2 Either party may terminate for material breach upon written notice if the breach remains uncured for fifteen (15) days.
7.3 Sections 5, 9 and 11 survive termination. ¶
💬 Dana Ferro · counterparty
We need 60 days — our board only meets quarterly.
Reply · Resolve
🔒 Internal note · only your team
Fine to concede if they accept our liability cap in §9.
§ 3 — AI, with receipts
Findings that cite their sources.
Most "AI contract review" is a chatbot doing a vibe check. version90's review is grounded: every finding cites the exact clause it came from, and the citation is verified against the document before it reaches you. If the AI can't point to the words, you never see the claim.
- → Extracts the contract type, parties, and every material term
- → Benchmarks each clause against your pinned standards
- → Explains any redline against the whole document
- → Suggests language; a human applies it — as a tracked change
Key terms
Master Services Agreement
- Counterparty
- Meridian Robotics, Inc.
- Effective date
- 2026-08-01
- Initial term
- 24 months, auto-renew
- Payment terms
- Net 60 (was Net 30)
- Governing law
- Delaware
- Liability cap
- None found ⚠
Liability is uncapped NONSTANDARD
“…each party shall be liable for all damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement.” — §9.2
No aggregate cap and no consequential-damages exclusion. Your standard caps at 12 months of fees.
Insert standard cap ✨ Explain implications
Payment terms moved to Net 60 DEVIATION
Your pinned standard says Net 30. The draft was quietly changed in the last round — §4.1.
every finding cites the clause it came from · verified against the document, never invented
§ 4 — The record
Version history every version immutable · every decision attributed
-
v4 Approved for signature · Sam Okafor today 14:02
status → awaiting signature
-
v3 Counterparty revision received via email · [email protected] today 09:41
+12 insertions · −4 deletions · 2 comments
-
v2 Internal redline applied · Priya Nair [Yourco] yesterday
6 tracked edits · 1 clause inserted from library
-
v1 Original received · [email protected] Mon
sha256 9f31…c2ae · preserved byte-for-byte
Change control that would survive an audit.
Every version is preserved byte-for-byte, exactly as received. Every accept, reject, edit, and comment is attributed to a person and a timestamp. When someone asks "who agreed to this clause?" — you'll have an answer instead of a search party.
And because the record is the system, not a folder convention, nobody has to remember to follow the rules for the rules to hold.
§ 5 — The parties (all of them — seats are free)
Unlimited users.
Two very separate conversations.
Per-seat pricing turns "should Priya see this contract?" into a budgeting question — so we don't charge per seat. Bring the founder, the ops person, the accountant, the cofounder who just wants to watch. People are free; only the work is metered.
And every negotiation gets two channels, structurally separated: comments travel with the document to the counterparty; internal notes stay on your side of the wall, always. The accidental reply-all where they learn your walk-away number? Can't happen — there's nothing to forward.
How collaboration works →💬 Comment · travels with the document
"We can accept 60 days' notice if §9's cap stays at 12 months of fees."
visible to Meridian Robotics ✓
🔒 Internal note · never leaves your team
"Their CFO already approved our number — hold the line and they'll fold by Friday."
structurally impossible to forward ✓
Your whole team, in the deal — $0.00 per seat, forever.
$0.00
per seat, per user, per anything-shaped-like-a-person
100%
of AI findings cited to the clause they came from
~90 sec
from signup to your first contract under review
99.9%
uptime target — we were told '110%' tests better, but math declined
§ 6 — Schedule of capabilities
Everything the expensive tools do.
Well — the parts you'd use.
01
Document management & change control
Every version preserved byte-for-byte, every change tracked, every decision audited. The end of FINAL_v7_ACTUALLY-FINAL(2).docx.
Read the deep dive →
02
Team collaboration
Comments your counterparty sees, internal notes they never do, and one queue that says whose turn it is.
Read the deep dive →
03
AI-assisted understanding
Findings that cite the exact clause they came from, plain-English explanations of any change — grounded, never invented.
Read the deep dive →
04
Contract archive intelligence
Upload the folder of PDFs you've been afraid to open since 2019. Get back a searchable, structured archive.
Read the deep dive →
05
Benchmarking & risk
Pin your standard terms and see exactly where a counterparty's draft deviates — clause by clause.
Read the deep dive →
06
Templates & clause library
Your best language, extracted from your best contracts, ready to insert as a tracked change.
Read the deep dive →
§ 7 — Consideration
One plan. $100/mo.
That's the pricing page.
The incumbents charge tens of thousands a year and make you sit through a demo to find that out. We put our price in a heading. Roughly 95% of the capability at roughly 5% of the price — the missing 5% is mostly the procurement paperwork.
See the whole pricing page anyway →Frequently asked questions
What is version90?
version90 is contract review and management software for small businesses and startups. You redline Word contracts in the browser with real tracked changes, AI reviews every draft against your standard terms with citations you can verify, and every version of every agreement is preserved in one searchable place — for $100/month.
Does version90 work with Microsoft Word documents?
Yes — natively. Edits made in version90 are written into the .docx as genuine Word tracked changes, so your counterparty opens a normal Word file with normal redlines. No conversion, no 'export to PDF and pray'.
How much does version90 cost?
One plan at $100 per month: unlimited users, 10 new contracts a month, 300 AI credits a month (a full review is 10 credits, an explanation 2 — roughly 30 reviews or 150 explains, any mix), and a 100-document archive with extraction included — with published credit top-ups for busy months. Enterprise CLM platforms typically start in the tens of thousands of dollars per year, after a sales process and an implementation project. We skipped all three.
Is version90 a law firm? Does it give legal advice?
No. version90 is software. AI findings, explanations, and extracted terms are informational aids to help you read and manage contracts — they are not legal advice, and important interpretations should be reviewed by a licensed attorney.
Do my counterparties need a version90 account?
No. Counterparties keep working exactly as they do today — in Word, over email. version90 ingests the documents they send, detects their changes and comments, and keeps the thread straight on your side.
Can AI really be trusted to review a contract?
Trust, but verify — which is exactly how version90 is built. Every AI finding cites the specific clause it came from, and that citation is verified against the document before you ever see it. A claim that can't be located in the text is discarded, not shown. You accept or reject everything; the AI never changes a document on its own.
In witness whereof
Retire the _FINAL_v7 filename.
One plan, $100/month, every feature. Your first contract can be under review in about ninety seconds.